Madras High Court

CONT P(MD)/2892/2025 of Ramar Vs Latcham on 17 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Cont.P.(MD)No.2892 of 2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 22.01.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

Cont.P.(MD)No.2892 of 2025

Ramar

... Petitioner

Vs.

Latcham,

Tahsildar,

Sivakasi Taluk Office,

Sivakasi,

Virudhunagar District.

... Respondent

Prayer:- Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying to initiate contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the respondent herein for her wilful disobedience to implement the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.25165 of 2023, dated 04.04.2025 and punish the respondent.

For Petitioner

: Mr.P.Ponraj

For Respondent

: Mr.P.Subbaraj

Special Government Pleader

____________

( Uploaded on: 23/01/2026 02:49:04 pm )

Cont.P.(MD)No.2892 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Alleging that the order of this Court dated 04.04.2025, made in W.P. (MD)No.25165 of 2023 has not been complied with, the petitioner has come up before this Court with this Contempt Petition.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner’s request for issuance of patta was rejected by the respondent vide proceedings dated 12.12.2025, on the ground that the land in Survey No.185/2 had already been assigned to one Uthan Mallaiya, S/o.Patharai Chettiar. It was further submitted that certain buildings have been constructed on the said land and that no further lands are available in the village for assignment to the petitioner.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said proceedings, if he is so aggrieved. (K.SURENDER, J.)

22.01.2026 smn2 ____________

( Uploaded on: 23/01/2026 02:49:04 pm )

Cont.P.(MD)No.2892 of 2025 To:- Latcham, Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk Office, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. ____________

( Uploaded on: 23/01/2026 02:49:04 pm )

Cont.P.(MD)No.2892 of 2025 K.SURENDER, J. smn2 Cont.P.(MD)No.2892 of 2025 22.01.2026 ____________

( Uploaded on: 23/01/2026 02:49:04 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead