Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/61134/2022 of SANJEEV KUMAR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (109) CRM-M-61134-2022 Date of Decision:-30.12.2022. Sanjeev Kumar ……Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Binat Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
(109) CRM-M-6]1 1 34-20Date of Decision:-30.12.2022.
Sanjeev Kumar,
Petitioner
Versus.
State of Punjab
...... Respon
CORAM:HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICEALOK JAIN
FE FE
Present:Mr. Binat Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab.
FE FE
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under)Section 438 Cr.P.C. praying for grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No.144 dated08.12.2022 under Section 489-A, 489-C, 489-D, 420 and 120-B IPC, 1914registered at Police Station Cantt. Jalandhar, District Jalandhar.
The allegations are that the petitioner purchased the fake)
currency notes of Rs.20 lacs by paying Rs.5 lacs original currency and the|same was disclosed by Ram Singh and Pawandeep Singh from whom|another fake currency of Rs.20 lacs was recovered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner|
was not named, in the FIR, however on the specific query put to the State|Counsel, he, on instructions from ASI Jaswinder Singh, submits that the|telephone number mentioned belongs to the petitioner.
The case is at the stage of investigation and it is a Serious case|
of fake currency being brought into the economy of the country. The|
amount may be less but it is a grave and serious economic offence.
No ground is made out for grant of anticipatory bail to the)petitioner.
The present petition is dismissed.
December 30, 2022.|manju
Whether speaking/reasoned:-Whether Reportable:- (ALOK JAIN)JUDGE
Yes/NoYes/No
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…