Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMMO/469/2018 on 31 December 2018

2018:HHC:9576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 469 of 2018 Date of Decision : December 31, 2018 Kartik Sharma ...petitioner Versus State of H.P. …respondent _______________________________________________________________

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _______________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Mr. Dinesh Thakur and Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Deputy Advocate General, for the State. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, at appropriate stage.

2. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings at appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if so required or desired. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge

December 31, 2018 (reena) 1Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9576 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:37:21 :::CIS

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead