Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/2005/2018 on 28 December 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2005 of 2018 Date of decision: December 28, 2018. Anil Kumar. ….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others. ….Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior
Advocate with Mr. Vijay K. Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Addl. AG with Mr. J.S.Guleria and Mr. Kunal Thakur, Dy. AGs for respondents No. 1 to 4. Respondent No. 5 already exparte. Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J.
(Oral)
Heard.
2. Consequent upon the order passed on the previous date, learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions submits that the points in issue in this writ petition are identical as were 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? yes. High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9509-DB ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:38:06 :::CIS
in CWP No. 2549 of 2015, titled Hem Raj versus State of H.P. & others and CWP No. 2638 of 2015, titled Devi Saran versus State of H.P. & others, decided vide judgments Annexure P-4 (colly). Being so, the claim of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgments ibid.
3. Therefore, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider his case in the light of the judgments hereinabove within two months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition and the judgments referred to hereinabove by the petitioner before the said respondent. The due and admissible benefits be released in favour of the petitioner within the same time. We also direct the respondents to continue to release the Grant-In-Aid in favour of the petitioner in future also.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge. (Chander Bhusan Barowalia), December 28, 2018, Judge.
(vs) 2 High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9509-DB ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:38:06 :::CIS