Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/1366/2018 on 28 December 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1366 of 2018 Date of Decision No.28.12.2018 ____________________________________________________ Sajad Deen …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …..Respondent. ____________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. S.C.Sharma & Mr. Dinesh Thakur Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Sequel to order dated 13.11.2018, Inspector/ SHO Mohinder Singh, Police Station, Kihar, District Chamba, H.P., has come present alongwith the record. Mr. Dinesh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, has also placed on record status report, prepared on the basis of the investigation carried out by the Investigating Agency.
2. Mr. Divya Raj Singh, learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9515 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:39:18 :::CIS
present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, in accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid prayer having been made by learned counsel representing the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired. (Sandeep Sharma),
Judge 28th December, 2018 (shankar) 2 High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9515 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:39:18 :::CIS