Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/1767/2018 on 28 December 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No.1767 of 2018 Date of decision : 28.12.2018 Pardeep Kumar
… Petitioner.
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the Petitioner : Ms. Yogita Dutt Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Mr. Dinesh Thakur and Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Dy. A.G. for the respondent- State. Sandeep Sharma, Judge (Oral) Sequal to order dated 27.12.2018, Head Constable Mohad. Khalid No.160, Women Police Station, Nahan District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh, has come present alongwith the record. Mr. Dinesh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, has also placed on record status report, prepared on the basis of the investigation carried out by the Investigating Agency. Record perused and returned. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9528 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:39:34 :::CIS
…2…
2. Ms. Yogita Dutt Sharma, learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, in accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid prayer having been made by learned counsel representing the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file afresh at appropriate stage, if required and desired.
4. Record reveals that the bail petitioner is behind bars since 22nd August, 2018, but till date, charge has not been framed despite filing of the Challan on 16.11.2018. Repeatedly this Court, on administrative side, has been issuing instructions to the Courts below to expedite the cases of the under trials and the persons who are in jail for quite long, as such, this Court hopes and trusts that the Court below shall make all efforts to conclude the trial expeditiously.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge December 28, 2018 (KS)
High Court of H.P. 2018:HHC:9528 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 14:39:34 :::CIS