Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/1776/2018 on 28 December 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 1776 of 2018 Decided on : 28.12.2018
Pawan Kumar
…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P.
….Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Hemant Vaid & Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Addl. A.Gs. with Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Dy.A.G.
Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral) The instant petition has been instituted by the bail petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C, for, his being released from judicial custody, wherein he is extantly lodged, for, his allegedly committing offence(s) punishable under Sections 15 and 21 of ND&PS Act, in respect whereof, FIR No. 144 of 2018 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
of 6.12.2018, is lodged, at Police Station Dharampur, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh.
2. An apt status report has been filed by the Investigating Officer. It is portrayed in the status report, that, the quantum of the relevant item of contraband, recovered, from the conscious and exclusive possession of the bail applicant, hence weighing 912 grams of poppy husk, and, 44 grams of heroin. The afore weight of puppy husk, and, heroin, as, recovered, from, the conscious and exclusive possession of the bailapplicant, hence falls in non commercial quantity thereof, (i) thereupon with their being no statutory bar, against indulgence, of, bail being affordable visàvis the weight, of, the afore relevant item(s) of contraband, as, recovered from the conscious and exclusive possession, of the bailapplicant, (ii) thereupon this Court is constrained, to allow the bail application, (iii) especially when no material has been placed on record, by the prosecution, demonstrative, of, qua in the event of bail being granted to the bail petitioner, there being/is every likelihood, of, his fleeing from justice or tampering with prosecution evidence. Accordingly, the indulgence of bail is granted to the bail petitioner, on the following conditions: i) That he shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs. 2,00,000/ with two local sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Solan, District Solan, H.P. ii) That he shall join the investigation, as and when required by the Investigating agency. iii) That he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police. iv) That upon his reindulging in crime, thereupon the State is at liberty for motioning this Court, for cancellation of bail. v) That he shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.
vi) That he shall deposit his passport, if any, with the Police Station, concerned. vii) That in case of violation of any of the conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner shall be forfeited and he shall be liable to be taken into custody.
3. Any observation made herein above shall not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial Court shall decide the matter uninfluenced by any observation made herein above. Copy dasti. (Sureshwar Thakur) Judge 28th December, 2018 (kck)