Central Administrative Tribunal
JITENDRA vs NORTHERN RAILWAY on 28 October 2026
Item No. 53 (C-3)
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
OA No. 1964/2026
MA No. 5485/2026
This the 28th Day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A)
Sh. Jitendra
S/o Sh. Prakash Chand (Currently Working as SSE/P.WAY/New Delhi).
R/o- Railway Quarter No.-11/6,
Delhi Kishanganj, Delhi-110007
.…Applicant
(None for the applicant)
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Union of India Ministry of Railway, Through the General Manager, Northern Railways, Headquarters' office Baroda House, New Delhi- 110001.
2. Principal Chief Personnel Officer Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi - 110001
3. Divisional Railway Manager Northern Railways, Estate Entry Road, New Delhi- 110001
4. APO, Northern Railway, Headquarters'office, Baroda House New Delhi -110001
5. APO/Engg, at DRM office, Northern Railway, Estate Entry Road, New Delhi- 110001
6. Director General, National Academy of Indian Railways, Lal Baug, Vadodara- 390004
.... RESPONDENTS
(By Advocate : Mr. Rohit Sambher with Ms. Illashree)
2026.10.30 17:51:24+05'30' NISHA KUMARI
Item No. 53 (C-3) ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Ms. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, Member (J) Pursuant to the orders of this Tribunal dated 20.05.2026, the respondents had permitted the applicant to participate in the LDCE for the post of Assistant Engineer, AEN/NR.
2. It is informed today that the applicant appeared in the CBT conducted by RRB, Ajmer, on 31.05.2026. As per the notification, the prescribed qualifying marks were 90 out of
150. However, the applicant secured only 54.10959 marks and, therefore, failed to qualify for further consideration in the selection process.
3. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the present OA.
4. Accordingly, the present OA stands disposed of. Pending MA, if any, also stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(Dr. Sumeet Jerath) (Harvinder Kaur Oberoi) Member (A) Member (J)
/nk/ 2026.10.30 17:51:24+05'30' NISHA KUMARI