Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5862/2026 of Sasikala Vs The Superintendent of Police on 29 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011453392026}
Sasikala
W/o.Gnanasekar,
D/o.Jayaraman,
No.23,
Akshaya Avenue,
Rajaram Road,
K.K.Nagar,
Trichy.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Office of Superintendent of Police,
Virudhunagar District
Virudhunagar.
2. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.
3. Jayaraman
S/o.Muthu,
No.427D,
Mangapuram Street,
Rajapalayam,
Virudhunagar.
4. Vairamuthu
S/o.Jayaraman,
No.427/312d,
Mangapuram Street,
Rajapalayam,
Virudhunagar.
__________
Page 1 of 3
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:18 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation from the file of the 2nd respondent to some other agency for the complaints given by the petitioner on 28.11.2024 and 23.09.2026
against respondents No.3 and 4 for their act of cheating and fraudulent in withdrawing saving amount of the petitioner's deceased mother Mrs.
Dhanalakshmi from her saving bank account.
For Petitioner(s)
:M/s Haja Mohideen A
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
for RR1 and 2
ORDER
This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to transfer the investigation relating to the petitioner’s complaints dated 28.11.2024 and 23.09.2026, given against the respondents 3 and 4 alleging cheating and fraudulent withdrawal of the savings amount of the petitioner’s deceased mother, Mrs. Dhanalakshmi, from her savings bank account, to some other agency.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final __________
Page 2 of 3
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:18 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026 disposal. Notice to the private respondents is dispensed with, as no adverse order is being passed against them.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that an enquiry into the petitioner’s complaints is pending before the respondent police.
4. Considering the nature of the grievance raised by the petitioner and the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the second respondent is directed to complete the enquiry on the petitioner’s complaints dated 28.11.2024 and 23.09.2026 and take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 29-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No skn To
1. The Superintendent of Police Office of Superintendent of Police
Virudhunagar
2. The Inspector Of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station Rajapalayam Virudhunagar District __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:18 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:18 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. skn WP Crl.(MD) No. 5862 of 2026 29-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:18 pm )
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…