Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5874/2026 of Balaji Vs The Represented on 29 October 2026

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5874 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 29-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5874 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011508812026}

Balaji

S/o, Lakkusamy,

No.8/36A1, Musukampatti,

Sethur, Manalattur,

Natham Taluk,

Dindigul District

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State Represented

Through the Superintendent of Police,

Dindigul District

2. The Inspector of Police

Natham Police Station,

Dindigul District

3. Meenammal,W/o, Nagarajan,

Musukampatti,

Sethur, Manalattur,

Natham Taluk,

Dindigul District

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents No.2 to provide adequate police protection to fence the property in Survey No.32/3A1 to an extent of 24-1/2 cents in Patta NO.5749 situated at Sethur Villagem Natham Taluk, Dindigul.

Page 1 of 3

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5874 of 2026

For Petitioner(s)

:M/s S. Manojkumar

For Respondent(s)

:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy

Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

for R1 and R2

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for fencing his property measuring 24½ cents comprised in Survey No.32/3A1, covered by Patta No.5749, situated at Sethur Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. Notice to the third respondent is dispensed with, as no adverse order is proposed to be passed against her.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that an enquiry in connection with the petitioner's representation is pending before the second respondent.

Page 2 of 3

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5874 of 2026

4. In view of the above submission, without going into the merits of the matter, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.09.2026, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the third respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. 29-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No skn To

1. The Represented Through the Superintendent of Police Dindigul District

2. The Inspector of Police Natham Police Station Dindigul District

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5874 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. skn WP Crl.(MD) No. 5874 of 2026 29-10-2026

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead