Madras High Court

CRP/4211/2026 of Yoganathan Vs Kanimozhi on 28 October 2026

CRP.No.4211 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

CRP.No.4211 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA011516022026}

and CMP.No.18365 of 2026

Yoganathan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Kanimozhi

2. Palaniappan

3. Meenatchi

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 21.04.2026 made in D.V.C.No.71 of 2018 on the file of Additional Mahalir Neethimandram, Salem.

For Petitioner

: Mr.T.Gnana Banu

For R1

: M/s.K.R.Samratt

For R2 and R3

: No Appearance

ORDER

The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate in D.V.C.No.71 of 2018, dated 21.04.2026, allowing the application filed by the 1st respondent under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act and directing the petitioner to pay maintenance to the 1st respondent and two children at the rate of Rs.30,000/- per month.

( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 01:14:31 pm )

CRP.No.4211 of 2026

Page 1 of 2

2. Against the order passed by the learned Magistrate, an appeal will lie under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Since the petitioner has got statutory appeal remedy under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, this Court is not inclined to exercise its supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

3. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the jurisdictional Sessions Court. It is made clear that the petitioner is entitled to exclude the time taken by him in prosecuting the revision before this Court (i.e., the period between 03.07.2026 to the date of receipt of copy of this order), while calculating the limitation for filing the appeal before the Sessions Court. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No dm Note: The Registry is directed to return the original certified copy of the impugned order dated 21.04.2026 made in D.V.C.No.71 of 2018 to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after obtaining necessary endorsement.

( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 01:14:31 pm )

CRP.No.4211 of 2026

To The Additional Mahalir Neethimandram, Salem.

( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 01:14:31 pm )

CRP.No.4211 of 2026

S.SOUNTHAR J. dm CRP.No.4211 of 2026 and CMP.No.18365 of 2026 28-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 01:14:31 pm )

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead