Madras High Court

WP/18638/2026 of T.SONIYAGANDHI Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR on 28 October 2026

2026/MHC/4371

WP No. 18638 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 18638 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA010941632026}

T.Soniyagandhi

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

Office of the Collectorate,

Tiruppatur District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Vaniyambadi Sub Division,

Tiruppatur District.

3. The Tahsildar

Vaniyambadi Taluk,

Tiruppatur District.

4. The Superintendent of Police

Tiruppatur District.

5. Malarkodi

6. G.Thiruppathi

..Respondent(s)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India issuing writ of mandamus directing the 1st to 4th respondents to remove the encroachment made by the 5th and 6th respondent on the Public road in S.No. 443/1, Kodiyur Village,Vaniyambadi Taluk, Tirupattur district by Considering the petitioners representation dated

WP No. 18638 of 2026

Page 1 of 3

02.03.2026.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.M.Arun

For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.K.Varshini

Government Advocate for R 1-3

Mr.N.Palanivel

Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R -4

R-5- not ready in notice

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of mandamus has been instituted directing the 1st to 4th respondents to remove the encroachment made by the 5th and 6th respondent on the Public road in S.No. 443/1, Kodiyur Village,Vaniyambadi Taluk, Tirupattur district by considering the petitioners representation dated 02.03.2026.

2. Learned Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that third respondent/Tahsildar conducted survey and identified encroachments. Thus, a report has been submitted to the Block Development Officer, Alapayam, who is the competent authority to initiate enforcement action for removal of encroachments.

3. In view of the fact that Revenue authorities submitted a report to the Block Development Officer, the Block Development Officer as well the third respondent/Tahsildar, Vaniyambadi has to initiate necessary

WP No. 18638 of 2026

Page 2 of 3

enforcement action for removal of encroachments by following the procedure as contemplated under the relevant statutes and rules and affording opportunity to the parties. The entire exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To

1. The District Collector Office of the Collectorate, Tiruppatur District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Vaniyambadi Sub Division, Tiruppatur District.

3. The Tahsildar Vaniyambadi Taluk, Tiruppatur District.

4. The Superintendent of Police Tiruppatur District.

WP No. 18638 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN, J. GD WP No. 18638 of 2026 28-10-2026

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead