Madras High Court

WP/33957/2026 of C.RANJITH CHANDRAN Vs District collector Thiruvallur District on 28 October 2026

2026/MHC/4398

WP No. 33957 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 33957 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA011772302026}

C.Ranjith Chandran

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. District Collector-Thiruvallur District District collectorate, Thiruvallur 602 001

2. Revenue Divisional officer

Taluk office Road, Ponneri 601 204

Thiruvallur District

3. Tahsildar,

New Madhavaram Taluk,

balaji Nagar, Gandhi Main Raod,

Puzhal chennai 600 066

4. Y. Mohammad Shibin

Elite Global School,

No 48 and 49 Kumarasamy Nagar,

Villivakkam, Chennai 600 049

..Respondent(s)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India issuing writ of mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein, to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 11.05.2026 and consequently remove the encroachments in the government poramboke land within a time stipulated by this Court in the manner known to law.

WP No. 33957 of 2026

Page 1 of 3

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.V.Balaji

For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Rishab Narayan

Government Advocate For R 1-3

Mr.S.Senthilvel For R-4

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk has filed a counter affidavit stating that an attempt has been made by the fourth respondent to encroach upon the Government land. However, the authorities intervened and the fourth respondent himself has removed the encroachment. The said fact has been stated in the counter affidavit in paragraph 7 and reads as under: “….7. I respectfully submit that during the Survey, it was found that the 4th Respondent had attempted to encroach upon the land comprised in S.No.229/4 of Kosappur village by erecting barbed wire fencing Wall. However, the 4th Respondent upon instructions, has removed the said encroachment by himself on 15.10.2026 and there is no encroachment on the said land at present….”

WP No. 33957 of 2026

Page 2 of 3

2. In view of the fact that attempt made by the fourth respondent has been averted, no further consideration is required. However, respondents 1 to 3 are bound to protect the Government land free from encroachments and utilize the same for public purposes.

3. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To

1. District collector Thiruvallur District District collectorate, Thiruvallur 602 001

2. Revenue Divisional officer Taluk office Road, Ponneri 601 204 Thiruvallur District

3. Tahsildar, new madhavaram Taluk, balaji Nagar, Gandhi Main Raod, Puzhal chennai 600 066

WP No. 33957 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN, J. GD WP No. 33957 of 2026 28-10-2026

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead