Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5843/2026 of Vigneswaran Vs The Superintendent of Police on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5843 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 28-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5843 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011491372026}

Vigneswaran

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police

Sivagangai District,

Sivagangai.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Sivagangai Sub Division,

Sivagangai.

3. The Inspector Of Police, Madagupatti

Police Station,

Sivagangai District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider and take appropriate action based on the representation dated 28.09.2026.

For Petitioner(s)

:Mr..C.Indrajith

For Respondent(s)

:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy

Counsel for State of TN (Crl.)

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5843 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and take appropriate action based on the representation dated 28.09.2026.

2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.), accepts notice for the respondents.

3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.

4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking appropriate action against the persons, who launched a murderous attack on him, is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.

5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5843 of 2026

6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interest party, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To

1. The Superintendent of Police Sivagangai District Sivagangai

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Sivagangai Sub Division Sivagangai

3. The Inspector Of Police, Madagupatti Police Station Sivagangai District

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5843 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5843 of 2026 28-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead