Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5847/2026 of R.Nanthini Vs The Superintendent of Police on 28 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011496152026}
R.Nanthini
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
O/o. Superintendent of Police,
Dindigul District.
2. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Awps-Vadamadurai Police Station, Dindigul District.
3. S.Nallasivam
4. P.Sanmugavel
5. S.Maariyammal
6. S.Ramesh
7. P.Sakthivel
8. S.Kavitha
9. S.Guru
10.Aarumugam
__________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026
11.A.Rashwari
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 18.08.2026 dispose of same on accordance with law and time frame that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr M Iniyavan
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)\
for R1 & R2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 18.08.2026 and dispose of same on accordance with law.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl), accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the remaining respondents is dispensed with.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself. __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking to take appropriate action against the private respondents herein for demanding more dowry is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as the private respondents, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police O/o. Superintendent of Police Dindigul District
2. The Inspector Of Police, Awps-Vadamadurai Police Station Dindigul District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5847 of 2026 28-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )