Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5848/2026 of S.K.Shivamarimuthu Vs The Superintendent of Police on 28 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5848 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5848 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011486792026}
S.K.Shivamarimuthu
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Superintendent Office,
Dindigul District,
Dindigul.
2. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station,
Dindigul.
3. V.Vasantha Lakshmi
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Ist respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner’s complaint against the second respondent and further directing the 2nd respondent not to harass or to forbear from harassing the petitioner by summoning him for enquiry, either orally or otherwise, in respect of the complaint lodged by the 3" respondent.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr. N.Sudhagar Nagaraj
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
for R1 & R2
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5848 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner’s complaint against the second respondent and further direct the 2nd respondent not to harass or to forbear from harassing the petitioner by summoning him for enquiry, either orally or otherwise, in respect of the complaint lodged by the 3" respondent.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.D.Rajaboppathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.), who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that no such representation was received by the respondent police from the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to give a fresh representation and that the respondent concerned may be directed to consider the same within a time to be stipulated by this Court.
4. In view of the above, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, directs the petitioner to give a fresh representation to the respondent police. Upon receipt of such
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5848 of 2026 representation, the respondent concerned shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate order within a period of two weeks thereafter.
5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police Superintendent Office Dindigul District Dindigul
2. The Inspector Of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station
Dindigul
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5848 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5848 of 2026 28-10-2026