Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5856/2026 of C.Ganesh Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. on 28 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5856 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5856 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011496852026}
C.Ganesh
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The
Superintendent of Police
Thanjavur District.
2. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Kumbakonam East Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 01.10.2026.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr S.Krishnan
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5856 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to take appropriate action based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 01.10.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.), accepts notice for the respondents.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by him, seeking appropriate action against one Thanalakshmi for allegedly committing forgery, is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate directions.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5856 of 2026
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interest party, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police Thanjavur District
2. The Inspector Of Police, Kumbakonam East Police Station Kumbakonam Thanjavur District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5856 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5856 of 2026 28-10-2026