Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5857/2026 of Kamalarasan Vs The Superintendent of Police on 28 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011440132026}
Kamalarasan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Inspector of Police
District Crime Branch,
Ramanathapuram District.
3. Sathiyapriya
4. Sivananda
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 and 2 respondents to conduct the enquiry in petitioner’s petition dated 29.08.2026 pending before 1st respondent.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr B.Mahendrarajan
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
__________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry in the petitioner’s petition dated 29.08.2026 pending before 1st respondent.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.) accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the remaining respondents is dispensed with.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by him, seeking appropriate action against the persons who allegedly executed a fraudulent document with the intention of grabbing his property, is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking appropriate directions. __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that no such representation has been received by the respondent police. If the petitioner submits a fresh representation, the same will be considered in accordance with law.
6. Considering the submissions made, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondent police. Upon receipt of such representation, the official concerned shall consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interest party, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026 To
1. The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District
2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Ramanathapuram District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5857 of 2026 28-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )