Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5858/2026 of Krishnakumar Vs The Superintendent of Police on 28 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011496832026}
Krishnakumar
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
Thoothukudi District,
Thoothukudi.
2. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Nalattinpudur Police Station, Thoothukkudi District.
3. Kalimuthu
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st &
2nd respondents to give adequate Police Protection at the time of laying boundary stones and fencing the Petitioner's land situated in S.F.No.91/1C/34 situated in Vanaramutty Village, Kovilpatti Taulk, Thoothukudi District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2026 within a stipulated time in accordance with law.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr M..Prabu
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi
Additional Public Prosecutor
for R1 & R2
__________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate Police Protection at the time of laying boundary stones and fencing the Petitioner's land situated in S.F.No.91/1C/34 situated in Vanaramutty Village, Kovilpatti Taulk, Thoothukudi District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2026 within a stipulated time in accordance with law.
2. Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the remaining respondent is dispensed with.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by him seeking to provide police protection to fence his property is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court. __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interest party, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026 To
1. The Superintendent of Police Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi
2. The Inspector Of Police, Nalattinpudur Police Station Thoothukkudi District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5858 of 2026 28-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 06:32:17 pm )