AMARTYA VASHISHT vs STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC) on 30 October 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 41 M.A./5285/2025 (DELHI) [ EXECUTION ] In O.A./411/2024 RECRUITMENT Court No.: 3 No of Adjournment: 8 Order Dated: 30/10/2026 AMARTYA VASHISHT Vs STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC)

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Akash Panwar For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Ranjan Tyagi Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondents have failed to comply with the order dated 18.09.2026 and have not filed any report demonstrating complete compliance with the directions issued by this Tribunal. He submits that the directions contained in the said order have not yet been implemented.

2. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that a petition challenging the order passed by this Tribunal is pending consideration before the Hon’ble High Court and is listed on 23.11.2026. He, therefore, requests that the present matter be deferred until the said date.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant, however, opposes the request for adjournment and submits that, despite the filing of the petition before the Hon’ble High Court, the respondents have neither obtained any stay of the directions issued by this Tribunal nor implemented the same, subject to the outcome of the pending petition. He further submits that, on the one hand, the respondents have not been able to obtain any interim protection from the Hon’ble High Court and, on the other hand, they are also not complying with the directions of this Tribunal.

4. He further submits that the respondents are not diligently pursuing the petition pending before the Hon’ble High Court, while the applicant, who is approximately 30 years of age, is losing valuable opportunities for employment and earning a livelihood on account of the continued non-compliance. He also points out that the Original Application itself was allowed by this Tribunal vide order dated 29.01.2025 and almost two years have elapsed since then.

5. We have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and taken note of the factual position, particularly the continued non-compliance with the directions of this Tribunal and the prejudice being caused to the applicant on account thereof. In view thereof Respondents SSC is directed to file compliance report.

6. In view of the above, Registry is directed to issue separate copy of the order to the Respondent No. 1.

7. List the matter on 30.11.2026. DASTI Dr. Sumeet Jerath Member (A) Harvinder Kaur Oberoi Member (J) Aarti ( steno )