Central Administrative Tribunal
Aniruddha Sharma and ors vs UNION OF INDIA on 28 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 12 M.A./3367/2026 (NAINITAL) [ IMPLEADMENT ] In O.A./1242/2026 PROMOTION M.A./1628/2026 Court No.: 999 No of Adjournment: 3 Order Dated: 28/10/2026 ANIRUDDHA SHARMA AND ORS Vs UNION OF INDIA
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Barjesh Mittal for the applicant in the OA., Mr. Abhishek Chauhan for applicant in MA No 3367/2026.
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Shiv Bhatt for the respondents in the OA. Order of The Tribunal MA No 1628/2026 The instant MA has been filed by 20 applicants seeking permission to contest OA No 1242/2026 jointly. OA No 1242/2026 has been filed by 20 applicants seeking common relief with common intention and against the same cause of action. In view of the averments made in the MA, the same is allowed, and the applicants are allowed to contest the matter jointly. Accordingly, the MA stands disposed of. MA No 3367/2026
The instant MA has been filed by the proposed interveners seeking impleadment as private respondents. The learned counsel for the proposed interveners contended that the proposed interveners are necessary and proper parties and the applicant in the OA has not arrayed them. The learned counsel for the original applicant and the original respondents in the OA fairly show no objection to the MA for impleadment. In view whereof and in view of the averments made in the MA, the same is allowed and disposed of. The learned counsel for the original applicant in OA is directed to file amended memo of parties on record within a period of two weeks. OA No 1242/2026 Mr D.S. Shukla, the learned counsel, submits that he was earlier representing respondent No. 02-AIIMS Rishikesh, and the brief has been assigned to Mr Shiv Bhatt, and he may be discharged from the matter. Issue notice to the newly impleaded private respondents. The newly impleaded private respondents may file a reply within a period of four weeks. The learned counsel for the official respondents submits that the applicant has not supplied a copy of the rejoinder to him. The learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to supply a copy of the rejoinder to the learned counsel for the official respondents. Re-notify on 20.11.2026 for completion of pleadings. Rajinder Kashyap Member (A) Ajay Pratap Singh Member (J) Abhay Chaudhary ( steno 'c' )