Central Administrative Tribunal

POOJA vs AIIMS on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 14 M.A./5004/2026 (NAINITAL) [ FOREFEITURE OF RESPONDANTS RIGHT TO FILE REPLY ] In O.A./3668/2025 APPOINTMENT Court No.: 999 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 28/10/2026 POOJA Vs AIIMS

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Sudeep Dey.

For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. D.S. Shukla. Order of The Tribunal MA No 5004/2026 The instant MA has been filed seeking forfeiture of the right of the respondents to file reply. Issue notice to the non-applicants/original respondents in the OA. OA No 3668/2025 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter relates to selection to the post of Store Keeper-cum-Typist, and the applicant has cleared all stages of the selection process and the applicant is suffering due to inaction on the part of the respondents in filing a reply.

2. As evident from the order sheet dated 23.09.2025, notice was issued to the respondents, and interim protection was also granted.

3. Thereafter, the matter was heard on 14.10.2025, 18.12.2025, 19.02.2026, 21.05.2026 & 22.07.2026 but till date no counter reply has been filed, and the respondents are not ready with the matter.

4. The learned counsel for the respondents seeks further four weeks' time as a last indulgence to file the counter reply.

5. Government of India order (1) Below Government of India (Authorization of officers for verfication of pleadings and other documents to be filed in the Central Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1993, (Swamy's compilation on Central Administrative Tribunal (Act, Rules and Orders) fourteenth edition-2023), provides that Ministers/departments should ensure that notices received from the Central Administrative Tribunal are complied within time to enable it to dispose of applications filed before it as expeditiously as possible. If for reasons, Ministry/ Department is unable to file their statement on the date fixed they should at least produce, through responsible officer, the required records/documents before the Tribunal on date lixed as it would be possible for the Tribunal to proceed with the case further on the basis of records/ documents even without a WS.

6. In the interest of justice, the respondents are granted one more opportunity to file the counter reply, and the same shall be taken on record subject to payment of cost of Rs. 5000/- payable to the applicant. It is made clear that if reply is not filed on or before the next date of hearing, we may be constrained to summon the erring respondents.

7. The pleadings in the matter are not complete and vide order dated 22.07.2026, the matter has been listed for final hearing.

8. The Registry is directed to list the matter under the "For Orders" category on 15.12.2026.

9. The Registry is directed to transmit a copy of the order passed today to the Director, AIIMS, Rishikesh, for information and compliance.

Rajinder Kashyap Member (A) Ajay Pratap Singh Member (J) Abhay Chaudhary ( steno 'c' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead