Madras High Court
OA/983/2026 of HDB Financial Services Limited Vs Honestraj R on 27 October 2026
OA No. 983 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
OA No. 983 of 2026
M/s.HDB Financial Services Limited,
Having its Registered Office at
Radhika, 2nd Floor, Law Garden Road,
Navrangpura Ahmedabad – 380 009.
Chennai Branch Office at
Old No. 64, New No. 84, A Block, 1st Floor, HDB
Towers, Greams Road,Thousand Light, Chennai
600006.
Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. P.Saravanan
..Applicant
Vs
1. Honestraj R
S/o.Ravi S
2. Malar R
W/o. Kannan
..Respondents
Original Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules read with Section 9(ii) (d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass an order of interim injunction restraining 2nd respondent by himself, his servants, assigns, agents, representatives, officers, trustees, beneficiaries, administrator/s or any other person claiming through or under them or under any instrument, whatsoever, from in any manner selling, alienating, transferring, parting with the possession of dealing with, disposing of, inducting anyone into or developing or creating any third party right or interest of whatsoever nature and in any manner whatsoever in respect of their property more fully described in the schedule hereunder.
OA No. 983 of 2026
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
mp
For Applicant :
Ms.Sujitha
for Mr.M.Arunachalam
For Respondents :
No appearance
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
By an order dated 21.09.2026, an order of interim injunction has been granted by this court even while ordering notice. By taking into account this post award Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 application, it is seen that when notice was sought to be served, the same was refused by the respondents.
2. In view thereof, service is treated as complete. Since the respondents have neither appeared before this court nor opposed this application, the application is allowed as prayed for. 27-10-2026 Neutral Citation: No mp OA No. 983 of 2026
OA No. 983 of 2026