Madras High Court
SA/527/2023 of RAJAMMAL Vs PAIYAMMAL on 27 October 2026
SA No. 527 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-10-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
SA No. 527 of 2023
and
CMP.Nos.16321 of 2023 and
17942 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA010827112023}
1. Rajammal
W/o Late Chithuraj, D.No.1-2/28,
Muniyappan Kovil St, Surapalli
Village, Jalakanda Puram Post, Mettur
Tk, Salem Dt
Appellant(s)
Vs
1. Paiyammal
W/o Late Ovi Reddy, D.No.3/339,
Reddiyur, Avadathur Village, Jalakanda
Puram Post, Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
2.Chithammal
W/o Late Chiththuraj, D.No.3/339,
Reddiyur, Avadathur Village, Jalakanda
Puram Post, Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
3.Thambi Durai
S/o Late Chiththuraj, D.No.3/339,
Reddiyur, Avadathur Village, Jalakanda
Puram Post, Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
4.Kavitha
D/o Late Chiththuraj, D.No.3/339,
Reddiyur, Avadathur Village, Jalakanda
Puram Post, Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )
SA No. 527 of 2023
5.Shanthi
D/o Late Chiththuraj, D.No.3/339,
Reddiyur, Avadathur Village, Jalakanda
Puram Post, Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
6.Rajasekar
S/o Ramasamy, Res at Chinnasuragai,
Surapalli Village and Post, Mettur Tk,
Salem Dt
7.Jayapriya
D/o Rajasekar, Res at Chinnasuragai,
Surapalli Village and Post, Mettur Tk,
Salem Dt
8.Minor Pavithra
D/o Rajasekar, Res at Chinnasuragai,
Surapalli Village and Post, Mettur Tk,
Salem Dt Rep by Father and Guardian
6th respondent
9.The Executive Officer
Town Panchayat, Office of Salem
Collector, Jalakanda Puram Post,
Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
10.Deputy Director, Town Panchayat
Salem Collector Office, Salem
Collectors Building, Salem1
11.Director Of Town Panchayat
Ezhilagam, Chenni
12.The Tahsildar
Mettur Tk, Salem Dt 636 401
13.The District Collector
Salem Dt, Salem 1
Respondent(s)
PRAYER
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure prays to set aside the Decree and Judgment passed in AS.No. 4 of 2020 dated 16.03.2023
on the file of Subordinate Judge, Mettur confirming the Judgement and Decree
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )
SA No. 527 of 2023
in OS.No. 108 of 2018 dated 12.12.2019 on the file of District Munsif, Mettur.
For Appellant(s):
Mr.R.Subramanian
For Respondent(s):
Mr.V.Elangovan For R1 To R5 ,
7 R6 - Addressee Cannot Be
Located
(r8 - Minor Rep. By R6)
Dr.S.Suriya For R9
Mr.P.Sunil Ga
For R10 To R13
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGEMENT
The appellant has filed this appeal to set aside the Judgement and Decree passed in AS.No. 4 of 2020 dated 16.03.2023 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Mettur, confirming the Judgement and Decree in OS.No. 108 of 2018 dated 12.12.2019 on the file of District Munsif, Mettur.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as they were ranked in the suit.
3. The appellant claims to be the wife of the deceased Chithuraj. However, she has not produced any relevant documentary evidence to substantiate her claim, except a passbook and a ration card. On the other hand, the second defendant, who also claims to be the wife of the deceased Chithuraj, has produced the service records of the deceased, wherein she is shown as his legal heir. She has also produced the relevant ration card and service records in support of her claim.
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )
SA No. 527 of 2023
4. Relying on the documentary evidence produced by the second defendant, the courts below held that the second defendant was the wife of the deceased and defendants 3 to 5 were his children. Since the appellant had failed to produce any relevant documents to establish her claim that she was the wife of the deceased, the courts below rightly dismissed the suit. This Court finds no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of the courts below.
5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 27-10-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rri
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )
SA No. 527 of 2023 To
1. The District Munsif, Mettur.
2. The Subordinate Judge, Mettur.
3. The Executive Officer Town Panchayat, Office of Salem Collector, Jalakanda Puram Post, Mettur Tk, Salem Dt
4. Deputy Director, Town Panchayat Salem Collector Office, Salem Collectors Building, Salem1
5. Director Of Town Panchayat Ezhilagam, Chenni
6. The Tahsildar Mettur Tk, Salem Dt 636 401
7. The District Collector
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )
SA No. 527 of 2023 Salem Dt, Salem Dt 636 401
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )
SA No. 527 of 2023 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri SA No. 527 of 2023
27-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 29/10/2026 05:43:52 pm )