Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5635/2026 of Thangam @ Ammal Thangam Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep b on 27 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5635 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5635 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011436342026}
Thangam @ Ammal Thangam
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu rep by The
Superintendent of Police,
Kanyakumari District
Nagercoil
2. The Inspector of Police,
Eraniel Police Station,
Eraniel,
Neyyoor Post,
Kanyakumari District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents police to provide police protection to construct the Compound wall in S.No.199/15, Kurunthancode A Village, Kalulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District in terms of Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.no.170 of 2004 dated 21.10.2009 by the Additional District Munsif Court, Eraniel and consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.09.2026.
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr. K. Sathiya Singh
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5635 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents police to provide police protection to construct the Compound wall in S.No.199/15, Kurunthancode A Village, Kalulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District in terms of Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.no.170 of 2004 dated 21.10.2009 by the Additional District Munsif Court, Eraniel and consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.09.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking to provide police protection to construct the Compound wall in the subject property is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5635 of 2026
5. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interest party, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 27-10-2026 Index: Yes/No (1/2) Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To
1. The Superintendent of Police
Nagercoil
2. The Inspector of Police Eraniel Police Station Eraniel Neyyoor Post Kanyakumari District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5635 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5635 of 2026 27-10-2026 (1/2)