Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5796/2026 of Balasekar Vs The Commissioner of Police on 27 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 27-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011472092026}
Balasekar
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Tiruchirappalli City.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ponmalai Zone, Tiruchirappalli City.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Trichy Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli City,
4. The Inspector of Police,
K.K.Nagar Police Station,
Tiruchirappalli District.
Tirichirappalli District.
5. The Inspector of Police,
Trichy Cantonment Police Station,
Tiruchirappalli District.
6. Balan,
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to not to interfere the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the sixth respondent by considering the petitioner’s .representation dated 28.09.2026.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026
For Petitioner(s)
:Mr. K.Navaneetharaja
For Respondent(s)
:Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl.)
for R1 to R5
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the sixth respondent by considering the petitioner’s .representation dated 28.09.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Crl.) accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 5. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the sixth respondent is dispensed with.
3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself.
4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner seeking not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the sixth respondent is pending without consideration. Hence, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026
5. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.) appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on instructions, submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner would be considered on its own merits within the time to be stipulated by this Court.
6. Considering the above said fact, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, directs the fifth respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, after affording a fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioner herein as well as any other interested parties, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. 27-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026 To
1. The Commissioner of Police Tiruchirappalli City
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Ponmalai Zone Tiruchirappalli City
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Trichy Cantonment Tiruchirappalli City
4. The Inspector of Police K.K.Nagar Police Station Tiruchirappalli District Tirichirappalli District
5. The Inspector of Police Trichy Cantonment Police Station Tiruchirappalli District
6. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5796 of 2026 27-10-2026