Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19123/2026 on 30 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19123 of 2026
Decided on: 30.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Narender Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Loveneesh Singh Thakur,
Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents .
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation, annexed with the writ petition, seeking applicability of Ranjit Singh and Others & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 and State of HP and others Versus Surajmani
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.2500 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 07.07.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:35:59 :::CIS
2 and Anr.3 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decisions, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 30, 2026
Judge R.Atal
3 LPA No.165 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 12.01.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:35:59 :::CIS