Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/19218/2026 on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No. 19176 of 2026 and

connected matters

Decided on: 30.10.2026

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CWP No.19176 of 2026 Babli Devi

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. CWP No.19174 of 2026 Sanjeev Kumar and Ors

…..Petitioners

Versus State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. CWP No.19257 of 2026 Mala Sharma

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. CWP No.19182 of 2026 Laxmi Devi

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. CWP No.19086 of 2026 Chandresh Kumari

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and Anr

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. CWP No.19222 of 2026 Sushma Sharma

…..Petitioners

Versus State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents

7. CWP No.19219 of 2026 Baljeet Singh and Ors

…..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. CWP No.19203 of 2026 Havinder Singh and Anr

…..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9. CWP No.19208 of 2026 Pawan Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. CWP No.19191 of 2026 Sonia Thakur

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11. CWP No.19187 of 2026 Aruna Kumari and Anr

…..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 CWP No.19101 of 2026 Jyoti Bala and Ors

…..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents

13 CWP No.19218 of 2026 Albel Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors

.....Respondents 14 CWP No.19172 of 2026 Pawan Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and anr

.....Respondents 15 CWP No.19189 of 2026 Ashwani Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Anr

.....Respondents 16 CWP No.19183 of 2026 Rupa Sharma

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Anr

.....Respondents 17 CWP No.19177 of 2026 Bhupinder Kumar and Ors

…..Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. and Anr

.....Respondents

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: M/s Yogesh K Chandel, Tek Chand,

Pankaj Thakur, Gurmeet Bhardwaj,

Kush Sharma, Mamta Garg, Vandana

Thakur, Sanjeev K Motta, Amit K

Dhumal and Surinder Prakash

Sharma, Advocates in the respective

writ petitions.

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in all the writ petitions.

2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors Vs. State of H.P. & Ors2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in 2 CWP No. 4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025.

accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.

The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 30, 2026

Judge R.Atal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead