Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/19284/2026 on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.19232 of 2026 alongwith

connected matters

Decided on: 30th October, 2026

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CWP No.19232 of 2026 Baldev

…..Petitioner

Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. CWP No.19252 of 2026 Khem Chand

…..Petitioner

Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. CWP No.19284 of 2026 Inder Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. CWP No.19431 of 2026 Amar Dev

…..Petitioner

Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Ors

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advoate.

For the Respondents: M/s Shrutika Chauhan, Rahul Thakur and Abhishek Thakur,

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

Advocates, for the respondents in the respective writ petitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Ms. Shrutika Chauhan, Mr. Rahul Thakur and Mr. Abhishek Thakur, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respondents in the respective petitions.

2. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners, who had retired from the service of the respondent–Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC), with the prayer that the respondents may be directed to pay the amount of retiral benefits alongwith interest for the delay on part of the respondents.

3. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated 25.08.2021, passed in CWP No.4377 of 2021, titled Sh. Subhash Chand versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla and others alongwith connected matters, in which, the respondents were directed to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners within a period of six months. In case the required retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioners within the aforesaid period of six months, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioners shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of actual payment.

4. In another subsequent order of this Court passed in CWP No.6034 of 2021, titled Ram Lal versus The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and another and the connected matter, decided on 23.11.2021, the respondents were directed to make payment of gratuity to the petitioners within a period of six months from the date of passing of the order. In the event of non-payment of due amount, the petitioners were held entitled to differential amount of interest between the amount of interest statutorily payable to the petitioners as per the Payment of Gratuity Act and the interest at the rate of 9% per annum for the period of delay beyond six months.

5. While disposing of Review Petition No.110 of 2021 on 25.11.2021, preferred against the order dated 09.11.2021 passed in CWP No.6928 of 2021, in which, the aforesaid order dated 25.08.2021 passed in CWP No.4377 of 2021 was relied upon, this Court has clarified the aforesaid order in the terms that the respondent- Corporation therein shall be liable to pay entire retiral dues of the petitioner, including gratuity, arrears of pension and leave encashment alongwith prescribed rate of interest, within a period of six months from the due date till the actual payment is made.

In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay the amount of remaining retiral benefits to the petitioners with actual rate of interest as per applicable rules till the time of actual payment, which shall be paid to them within a period of six months from today. The due amount of payment, if delayed beyond six months, shall be paid with interest at the rate of 9% per annum till the date of its actual payment. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 30, 2026

Judge R.Atal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead