Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/19417/2026 on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

CWP No.19417 of 2026.

Decided on : 30

th October

, 2026

Renu Devi & Ors. ...Petitioners.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

Coram:

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhanu Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioners’ seek applicability of Mohinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievance raised in the writ petition.

3. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring representation(s) within two weeks from today and they would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWP No. 3493 of 2028, decided on 10.08.2026. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:39:41 :::CIS

2 the same in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority that in case the petitioners submit representation(s) within two weeks from today, the same be considered and decided in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 30th October, 2026.

(jai)

High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:39:41 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead