Central Administrative Tribunal
BAL KRISHNA KR SINHA vs RAILWAY on 29 October 2026
-1- OA/050/00474/2019
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PATNA BENCH,PATNA
OA/050/00474/2019
With
MA/050/00414/2019
Date of Order: 29.10.2026
CORAM
HON’LE MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER (A)
Bal Krishna Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Triveni Prasad Verma, Ex-Chief Typist, Zonal Railway Training Centre, East Central Railway, Muzaffarpur (Bihar), Resident of House No. 031-0213, Ward No. 7, Road No. 5 Chitrakut Nagar, Bibiganj, Muzaffarpur, Pin Code-842001
(Bihar).
……..Applicant.
- By Advocate(s): - Shri M.P. Dixit
-Versus-
1. The Union of India, through the Generral Manager, east Central Railway, Hajipur, P.O.- Digghi Kalan, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, Pin Code- 844101 (Bihar).
2. The General Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Hajipur, P.O.- Digghi Kalan, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, Pin Code-844101 (Bihar).
3. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Sonpur, District- Saran-841101 (Bihar).
4. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Sonpur, District- Saran -841101 (Bihar).
5.
The Senior Divisional Financial Manager, east Central Railway, Sonpur, District- Saran-841101 (Bihar).
6.
The Principal, Zonal Railway Training Centre, East Central Railway, Muzaffarpur-842001 (Bihar).
…….Respondents.
By Advocate(s) :- Shri Bindhyachal Rai, ASC
Digitally signed by
SURYAROOP KABI
SURYAROOP
KABI
-2- OA/050/00474/2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[ORAL]
[Per Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Member(A)]
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has fairly submitted that the grievances of the applicant sought to be redressed in this OA has already been taken care of by the respondent officials and now there is no surviving grievance to be adjudicated upon.
3. Learned counsel for respondents has also expressed the similar view.
4. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, there is nothing in this OA to be adjudicated upon as the OA has been rendered infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the OA is disposed of as having become infructuous. MA No. 414/2019 is also disposed of accordingly.
6. No order as to costs.
(Kumar Rajesh Chandra) Member(A) Srk. Digitally signed by SURYAROOP KABI SURYAROOP KABI