EX.PT/40/2026 on 30 October 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition No.40 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Nikka Ram & Ors.

…….Petitioners

Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

… Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? 1

For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):

Careful perusal of compliance affidavit filed at the behest of the respondents, this Court is convinced and satisfied that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in instant proceedings.

2. Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, vehemently argued that compliance is not in terms of mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed, but this Court is of the view that correctness of order passed in purported

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:42:56 :::CIS

compliance of the judgment sought to be executed cannot be looked into in the instant proceedings, rather for that purpose, appropriate remedy for him is to file independent proceedings.

3. In view of the above, present execution petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of judgment sought to be executed.

(Sandeep Sharma),

Judge October 30, 2026 (sunil)

High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:42:56 :::CIS