EX.P./2210/2026 on 30 October 2026

2026:HHC:47801

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2210

of 2026

Decided on: 30

th October, 2026

_______________________________________________________ Het Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others

...Respondents ________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Chandranarayana Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the direction given by this Court in the judgment which is sought to be executed, the competent authority has now passed an order and the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

2. Since this Court while disposing of the petition had only given direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a representation qua the reliefs prayed for in the petition to the Authority within two weeks from the date of passing of the judgment, the same shall be decided, the mandate contained in the judgment dated 25.05.2026, passed in CWP No.8645 of 2022, titled, Sh. Het Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has duly

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:43:18 :::CIS

been complied with and as such the execution petition is disposed of as having been fully satisfied. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the competent authority, he may avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

th October, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:43:18 :::CIS