Central Administrative Tribunal
Binay Kumar Singh vs NIELIT on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 14 O.A./629/2026 (PATNA) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 2 Order Dated: 29/10/2026 BINAY KUMAR SINGH Vs NIELIT
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Ms. Tulika Singh.
For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Rabindra Kumar Choubey, ld. ASC for O.P. No. 2 to 4., Shri U.N. Singh, l/c for O.P. No.1. Order of The Tribunal Learned counsels for both the parties are present. Counsel for the Opposite Parties No. 2 to 5 submitted that he has filed the W.S. in the form of reply which is on record. Counsel for the Opposite Party No.1 has submitted that he is adopting the W.S./reply filed by O.P. Nos. 2 to 5 and he will not prefer to file seperate W.S. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that she has just received the copy of W.S. today and she may be given an opportunity to peruse the written statement and to file rejoinder, if needed. In view of the above, I grant an opportunity to the counsel for the applicant to file rejoinder within a weeks. It is made clear that the rejoinder, if any, shall be confined only to the new facts mentioned in the written statement or such facts which require specific denial. List the case on 26.11.2026. Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Binay Prasad ( ps )