Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/3223/2022 on 29 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No. 3223/2026

Decided on: 29.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jagjeet Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus HPSEB Ltd. & Anr.

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1

For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs: - “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant pay scale and allowances to the petitioner from the date he was made temporary employee, in the regular establishment of the Board and his pay may be fixed accordingly and the benefits incidental thereof may also be given to the petitioner.

(ii) That the entire service rendered by the petitioner a temporary employee be counted for the purpose of pension and other retiral benefits.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions not to press relief No. (i). As regards relief No.

(ii) , learned counsel further submits that the issue raised by the petitioner has already been adjudicated upon in Jaffar Ali Vs. HPSEB & Anr. 2 Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWOA No. 2662/2020 decided on 20/04/2026 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:45:00 :::CIS

2 would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider and decide his case for grant of relief No. (ii) in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed-time schedule.

Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Judge

29th October, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:45:00 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead