Madras High Court
CRL OP/31024/2026 of P.Parthiban Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police on 26 October 2026
CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012321602026}
P.Parthiban
S/o Parasuraman,
No.116, Karpagar Vinayagar Koil Street,
Kangeyan Kuppam,
Pulleri Sogandi,
Thirukazhukundram Taluk,
Chengalpattu District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police Mamallapuram Police Station, Chengalpattu District.
2. Kalpana
W/o Parthiban,
No.19, Thirukulam Street,
Mamallapuram,
Chengalpattu District.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the entire records relating to the Crime no.170 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the 1st Respondent/Police Inspector of Police Mamallapuram Police Station, Chengalpattu District and Quash the FIR as against the petitioner and pass such further or other orders.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.T.R.Ravi
For Respondent(s):
Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar,
Additional Public Prosecutor For R1
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 03:49:13 pm )
CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.170 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent, registered for the offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) of BNS and under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act.
2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner and the defacto complainant. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card and it is made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641 in the case of Parbathbhai Aahir
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 03:49:13 pm )
CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026
@ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,/Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the FIR in Crime No.170 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent.
5. In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No. 170 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26-10-2026 Vv To
1. The Inspector of Police, Mamallapuram Police Station, Chengalpattu District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 03:49:13 pm )
CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. VV CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026 26-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 03:49:13 pm )
CRL OP No. 31024 of 2026
( Uploaded on: 30/10/2026 03:49:13 pm )