Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19018/2026 on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.19018 of 2026.
Decided on : 29
th October
, 2026
Sanjeev Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner seeks applicability of State of HP and others Versus Surajmani and Anr.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievance raised in the writ petition.
3. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today and he would be content in case the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 LPA No.165 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 12.01.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:45:26 :::CIS
2 respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondent is not averse to this prayer.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today, the same be considered and decided in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 29th October, 2026.
(jai)
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:45:26 :::CIS