Central Administrative Tribunal
RAHUL RAJ vs Postal on 28 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 28 O.A./736/2017 (PATNA) [ APPOINTMENT ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 36 Order Dated: 28/10/2026 RAHUL RAJ Vs POSTAL
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Aman Kumar Singh For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. T. N. Thakur, CGSC Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for the parties are present. Counsel Mr. Aman Kumar Singh, holding the brief of counsel for the applicant, Mr. Jayant Kumar Karn, submits that he may be granted an opportunity to obtain instructions from the applicant as to whether the grievance raised in the present O.A. survives or has become infructuous. He accordingly seeks some time for the said purpose. Counsel for the opposite party has not opposed the prayer. In view of the submissions made, a final opportunity of three weeks is granted to counsel for the applicant to obtain necessary instructions/argue the case finally.
Since this matter pertains to the year 2017 and falls within the category of critical old cases, no further adjournment shall be granted on this ground. It is made clear that if the counsel for the applicant does not argue the matter on the next date of hearing, the Tribunal shall proceed in accordance with law on the basis of the material available on record. List this case on 30.11.2026.
KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Sonali Lal ( court master )