Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19043/2026 on 29 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 19020 of 2026 along with
connected matters.
Decided on : 29
th October, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19020 of 2026 Brij Lal ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
2. CWP No. 19048 of 2026 Krishani Devi ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
3. CWP No. 19061 of 2026 Vipin Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
4. CWP No. 19312 of 2026 Suresh Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
5. CWP No. 19313 of 2026 Rajender Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
6. CWP No. 19043 of 2026 Amba Dutt ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Ankit Chandel, Advocate and Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the respondents-State.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents- State.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage.
3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, seeking applicability of State of HP and others Versus Surajmani and Anr.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 LPA No.165 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 12.01.2023
prayer.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 29th October, 2026.
(jai)