Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/19051/2026 on 29 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

CWP No.19051 of 2026.

Decided on : 29

th October

, 2026

Laxmi Singh ...Petitioner.

Versus HPSEBL & Anr. ....Respondents.

Coram:

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioner’s seeks applicability of The Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. & Anr. vs.Nanak Chand & Ors.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievance raised in the writ petition.

3. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today and he would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).10719-10720/2025 decided on 16.04.2025. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:46:18 :::CIS

2 the same in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondent is not averse to this prayer.

4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today, the same be considered and decided in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 29th October, 2026.

(jai)

High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:46:18 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead