Central Administrative Tribunal

ABHAY KUMAR NO III vs EXPENDITURE on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 18 O.A./115/2026 (PATNA) [ SENIORITY ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 5 Order Dated: 28/10/2026 ABHAY KUMAR NO III Vs EXPENDITURE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri M.P. Dixit.

For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Ram Kinker Choubey, ld. Sr. Panel Counsel for O.P.Nos. 2 to

5. Order of The Tribunal Counsel for the applicant is present. Shri Ram Kinker, learned counsel for Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 5, is present. A written statement on behalf of Opposite Parties No. 2 to 5 and rejoinder have been filed. Neither any written statement has been filed on behalf of Opposite Party No. 6 despite service of notice, nor anyone has appeared on his behalf. Hence, the case shall proceed ex-parte against Opposite Party No. 6. Pleadings are complete. Heard. Admit. List the case on 05.01.2027 for final hearing.

KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Binay Prasad ( ps )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead