Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19105/2026 on 29 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 19105 & 19106 of 2026
Decided on: 29.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19105/2026
Satpal & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
2. CWP No. 19106/2026
Jagjit Singh Butail & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Kush Sharma and Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta, Advocates, for the petitioners in the respective petitions.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General in all the petitions.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:48:26 :::CIS
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 29th October, 2026(rohit)
2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:48:26 :::CIS