Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19400/2026 on 29 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos.19394 & 19400 of 2026
Decided on: 29.10.2026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19394 of 2026
Veena Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CWP No. 19400 of 2026
Lekh Raj (Ram)
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K Gupta and Mr. Bonit Thakur,
Advocates
For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in both the writ petitions.
2. Petitioners seek applicability of Baldev Versus 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:49:38 :::CIS
2 State of H.P. & Ors.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petitions.
3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring representations within two weeks from today. In case such representations are so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 29, 2026
Judge R.Atal
2 CWP No.2711 of 2017, decided alongwith connected matter on 22.02.2022 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:49:38 :::CIS