Himachal Pradesh High Court
CMPMO/435/2016 on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.435 of 2016
Date of decision:29.10. 2026
Kanwar Vijay Singh
...Petitioner
Versus Akshay Dogar & another
...Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr.Y.P. Sood, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Vidhur Kapoor, Advocate, vice Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
It is contended by the learned vice counsel for the petitioner that in view of intervening developments, the present petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The records of the court below be sent immediately.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 29th October, 2026.
(vt) Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:50:23 :::CIS