Central Administrative Tribunal

mst rukhsana vs EDUCATION on 2 November 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SRINAGAR

Order Sheet

Item no.: 13

O.A./930/2024 (SRINAGAR)

[ RE FIXATION OF PAY ]

[ SENIOR CITIZEN ]

Court No.: 1

No of Adjournment: 9

Order Dated: 02/11/2026

MST RUKHSANA

Vs

EDUCATION

For Applicant(s) Advocate : SHAHID VICE AZHAR UL AMIN

For Respondent(s) Advocate : SATINDER SINGH, AAG , IRSHAD AHMAD FOR

RESPONDENT NO. 3

Order of The Tribunal

1. Learned counsel for the parties are present.

2. The respondent No.3 has already filed reply. However, the reply on behalf of respondents 1, 2, 4 and 5 has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel appearing for respondents 1,2,4 and 5 seeks time to file reply. Be filed on or before the next date fixed, with an advance copy to the other-side.

4. List the matter on 22.12.2026. Justice Ritu Tagore Member (J) Jagdish ( ps consultant )

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead