Central Administrative Tribunal

Peer iftikhar ahmad vs PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B on 2 November 2026

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL SRINAGAR

Order Sheet

Item no.: 19

O.A./1148/2025 (SRINAGAR)

[ RETIRAL BENEFITS ]

[ SENIOR CITIZEN ]

Court No.: 1

No of Adjournment: 8

Order Dated: 02/11/2026

PEER IFTIKHAR AHMAD

Vs

PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT R AND B

For Applicant(s) Advocate : SHEEBA RASHID THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE

For Respondent(s) Advocate : SYED MUSAIB, DY. AG , MUBASHIR MALIK FOR

RESPONDENT NO.2

Order of The Tribunal

1. Learned counsel for the parties are present.

2. Despite clear directions from this Tribunal vide order dated 22.09.2026, the reply has not been filed by the Respondents No 1 and 3 to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the reply was ready but same required some corrections, so, it was resent to the concerned Authorities for doing the needful.

4. He seeks further time to file the reply on behalf of Respondents No. 1 and 3 to 5.

5. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, last and final opportunity is granted to file the reply on behalf of Respondents No. 1 and 3 to 5, with an advance copy to the other-side, failing which they shall lose the right to file the reply.

6. List the matter on 01.02.2027.

Justice Ritu Tagore Member (J) Jagdish ( ps consultant )

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead