Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1718/2026 on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:47498
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.1718 of 2026
Decided on: 29th October, 2026
Dharam Pal
....Petitioner
versus
State of H.P. and others
...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Ms. Tim Saran Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 28.10.2026 issued by the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copy of office order dated 28.10.2026 passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P., which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of aforesaid office order reveals that the case of the petitioner has been considered and he has been allowed higher pay stage of Rs.40100/- after two years of regular service subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023 titled 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:51:14 :::CIS
2026:HHC:47498 2
as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDO concerned has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner, calculate the arrear, submit budget demand of arrear to the office of the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Bilaspur and finally release the arrears at the earliest.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 22.09.2025 passed in CWP No.15278 of 2025, titled, Dharam Pal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case the arrears are not paid to the petitioner strictly in terms of the directions passed by this Court in the judgment sought to be executed within eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 29th October, 2026
Judge (naveen) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:51:14 :::CIS