Himachal Pradesh High Court
CRMPM/1756/2026 on 29 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:HHC:47543 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No.1756 of 2026 Decided on : 29.10.2026 Suresh Parmar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P.
…..Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chirag Bhanu Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General, assisted by I.O. Yogesh Kumar, Police Station SV&ACB, Hamirpur, H.P. Chirag Bhanu Singh,
Judge
(Oral):
The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’), seeking anticipatory bail for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the IPC), and Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, registered vide FIR No.02 of 2026, dated 19.08.2026, at Police Station State Vigilance & Anti- Corruption Bureau, Hamirpur, H.P.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:51:50 :::CIS
( 2026:HHC:47543 )
2. Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions from the Investigating Officer submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner/accused is not required. The investigating agency is in the process of going through the records and the audit reports of many years have to be verified which is, however likely to take time.
3. Thus, keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances emerging on record and keeping in view the fact that the investigation spans from the year 2009-2010, the interim order dated 09.09.2026 is confirmed. It is however, made clear that the petitioner shall join the investigation, if so required.
4. Needless to say that the petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence nor hamper the investigation of the case in any manner, whatsoever.
5. Petition stands disposed off in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
(Chirag Bhanu Singh) Judge October 29, 2026 (subhash sharma) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2026 15:51:50 :::CIS