Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5769/2026 of Christopher Sandhyaku Vs The Superintendent of Polie on 26 October 2026
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5769 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN
THILAKAVADI
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5769 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011476742026}
Christopher Sandhyaku
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Superintendent of Police
o/o The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District
2. The Inspector of Police
District Crime Branch, Superintendent of Police office, Dindigul District
3. Motachamammal
4. Sesuraj Servai
5. Susai Servai
6. Arockiyam Servi,
7. Amirtharaj
8. Anthony
9. Arulanandam
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to forthwith complete the preliminary enquiry considering the petitioner’s representation dated 31.08.2026 within a
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5769 of 2026
stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner(s):
M/s S.Lawrence Vimal Raj
For Respondent(s):
Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi
Additional Public Prosecutor
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to forthwith complete the preliminary enquiry considering the petitioner’s representation dated 31.08.2026 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
2. Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petition enquiry is pending with the second respondent. As the petitioner has not appeared before the Enquiry Officer, they are unable to complete the enquiry.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner is directed to strictly cooperate with the Enquiry Officer, the second
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5769 of 2026 respondent herein.
5. The second respondent shall conduct the enquiry as expeditiously as possible after affording an opportunity of hearing to both sides, conclude the same, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police, o/o The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District
2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Superintendent of Police office, Dindigul District
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
WP Crl.(MD) No. 5769 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. TM WP Crl.(MD) No. 5769 of 2026 26-10-2026