Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5773/2026 of R.Mariappan Vs The Superintendent of Police on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5773 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 26-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5773 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011490922026}

R.Mariappan

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police

Dindigul District,

Dindigul

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Vedasandur,

Dindigul District

3. The Inspector of Police

Gujiliamparai Police Station,

Gujiliamparai,

Dindigul District

4. Balasubramani

5. Mariappan

6. Vairamuthu

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1 to 3

Respondents herein to take action against the 4 to 6 Respondents herein for threatening the petitioner and his wife based on his Complaint dated 21.09.2026.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5773 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. G.Gomathisankar

For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi

Additional Public Prosecutor

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 herein to take action against the respondents 4 to 6 herein for threatening the petitioner and his wife by considering the petitioner’s complaint dated 21.09.2026.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner lodged a complaint with the respondent police alleging that the private respondents had threatened him and his wife in connection with the demand for providing a pathway through his agricultural land. Since no action has been taken on the said complaint, the petitioner has approached this Court.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that this is a case and case in counter and enquiry is pending.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5773 of 2026

4. In view of the above submission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the third respondent is directed to conduct enquiry on the petitioner’s complaint dated 21.09.2026 and upon enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, take appropriate action in accordance with law. The outcome of the enquiry shall be communicated to the petitioner. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 26-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Rmk To

1. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District, Dindigul

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vedasandur, Dindigul District

3. The Inspector of Police Gujiliamparai Police Station, Gujiliamparai, Dindigul District

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

WP Crl.(MD) No. 5773 of 2026 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. Rmk WP Crl.(MD) No. 5773 of 2026 26-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead